WEEK 5 / 2026
Tampa Bay Buccaneers24
Dallas Cowboys16
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
3 key playsSee why
Opening the record…
Opening the record…
NFL / 2026 SEASON
The score. The penalties. The referee’s history.
Go beyond the score.
Get a clear verdict.
THE GAMES, EXPLAINED
Showing 65 of 65 analyzed games across all weeks. 18 rated Hmm or higher. What the scale means ↗
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
Compare the final score with the spread and what the teams’ performance usually produces.
See team averages, opponent tendencies and referee history alongside what happened.
Give the rating a thumbs-up or thumbs-down, suggest your own score and join the discussion.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
Penalty patterns were this unusual in 1 of 779 comparison games.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
3 defensive penalties extended one CHI drive on third or fourth down.
Penalty patterns were this unusual in 11 of 779 comparison games.
2 defensive penalties extended one DAL drive on third or fourth down.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
Penalty patterns were this unusual in 6 of 779 comparison games.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
IND finished 26.2 points above its box-score expectation.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
2 defensive penalties extended one CHI drive on third or fourth down.
2 defensive penalties extended one DEN drive on third or fourth down.
2 defensive penalties extended one LV drive on third or fourth down.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
BUF finished 24.0 points above its box-score expectation.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
JAX finished 19.8 points above its box-score expectation.
The final score was unusually far from the pregame spread.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
2 defensive penalties extended one LAC drive on third or fourth down.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
Penalty patterns were this unusual in 0 of 779 comparison games.
The final score was unusually far from the pregame spread.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
CIN finished 22.1 points above its box-score expectation.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
2 defensive penalties extended one DET drive on third or fourth down.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
2 defensive penalties extended one DAL drive on third or fourth down.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
3 defensive penalties extended one MIN drive on third or fourth down.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
Penalty patterns were this unusual in 17 of 779 comparison games.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.
The result and penalty pattern fit the usual historical range.